One possible ‘back story’ behind (or obstructing) low code is the desire of coders to build stuff themselves.
The story of the person who built a piece of custom software and then got easy money for the next 10 years supporting it (and naming their price – because they are the only person who understood it) is often told within the software industry.
But more to the point, if you (as a coder) had spent years developing a skill, would you welcome making that skill redundant? It is (in a sense) as likely as London Underground drivers voting for driverless trains?
Perhaps the truth is that Low Code could mean quite a bit of change in the employment market for coders. Hand coders could become more redistributed – with more employment in low code companies and a few super specialist coders working for big companies doing specialist integrations.
But there will also be a growing market for people who can configure, understand, adapt, use their brains creatively and work out new solutions. That could be more exciting than coding.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.